All Custom GPT tools
Store publicTarget query: landing page review for B2B

Review a B2B landing page for clarity, proof, and CTA friction

A focused Custom GPT that scores only the supplied page evidence, rewrites the core message without inventing proof, and ends with three prioritized fixes.

Runs inside ChatGPT. Sign-in and current ChatGPT plan availability may apply. No Store position or anonymous access is promised.

Landing Page Review for B2B GPT avatar
Landing Page Review for B2B
Prompt-only Custom GPT by KikuAI Studio

What you provide

  • A B2B landing-page screenshot or the visible page copy
  • The actual audience, product facts, proof, offer, and CTA shown on the page
  • An optional page goal such as qualified demo requests

What you should get

  • A seven-section review with an evidence-grounded eight-row scorecard
  • Exactly four core rewrites: Headline, Subhead, Primary CTA, and Proof block
  • One bounded A/B test and three prioritized fixes with before-and-after changes

Use it for a narrow task.

  • Check what a B2B buyer understands in five seconds
  • Find vague positioning, weak proof, hidden objections, or competing CTAs
  • Rewrite the hero without making the product claim stronger than the evidence
  • Compare a revised page with the previous version using the same scorecard

Illustrative input

Headline: Close month-end faster. Subhead: Reconcile Shopify, Stripe, and bank payouts for finance teams. CTA: Book a walkthrough. No customer proof is supplied.

Expected format

Five-second read
The audience and reconciliation job are visible, but the outcome and proof remain weak.

Scorecard excerpt
- Audience clarity: 4/5
- Problem clarity: 3/5
- Proof: 0/5
- CTA: 4/5
- Visual hierarchy: 0/5 - unobservable from copy-only input

Rewrite excerpt
Headline: Reconcile Shopify, Stripe, and bank payouts in one month-end workflow.
Proof block: [verified customer or outcome evidence]

Top fix
Add one supplied, verifiable proof point next to the primary CTA.

Illustrative synthetic excerpt only. It demonstrates grounded placeholders rather than a claimed live conversion result.

Limits that matter

  • It reviews only the supplied screenshot or copy and does not inspect a live website.
  • It does not invent customers, outcomes, traffic, conversion rates, market facts, or proof.
  • Visual hierarchy is marked unobservable when the input contains copy but no layout evidence.
  • The review is a structured critique, not a guarantee that a rewrite will improve conversion.

Privacy boundary

The screenshot or copy is sent to ChatGPT. Remove unpublished customer names, private pricing, traffic or conversion data, credentials, and confidential claims that are not required for the review.

Try one of these prompts.

  1. 01Review this B2B landing-page screenshot.
  2. 02Tell me what a buyer understands in five seconds.
  3. 03Rewrite the headline, subhead, and CTA.
  4. 04Find the biggest trust and conversion leaks in this copy.

Questions before you open it.

Can it review a landing-page screenshot?

Yes. A screenshot lets the GPT review both visible copy and layout evidence. A cropped screenshot should be assessed only within the visible area.

Can I paste the copy instead?

Yes. Copy-only input is supported, but Visual hierarchy should be scored 0/5 as unobservable rather than inferred.

Will it invent stronger proof or conversion numbers?

It should not. Missing audience, proof, analytics, sample, or test parameters stay as explicit square-bracket placeholders.

Can it compare a revised page with the first version?

Yes. In the same conversation it should reuse the eight-row scorecard, mark every dimension improved, regressed, or unchanged, and explain every score change.